Intermittency: Achilles’ heel of renewable energy

William Pickard believes in long range planning—at least 70 years into the future.  He foresees the economic end to earth’s fossil fuel supply before the end of this century, and hopes to promote a smooth transition to an energy future fueled by renewables.  But he is wary of what has been called the Achilles’ heel of renewable energy—intermittency.

This retired Washington University professor of electrical and systems engineering fears that in their retirements his grandchildren will have a drastically reduced standard of living if the world does not develop and implement  technology to assure a constant supply of electricity.

William Pickard, professor at Washington University
William F. Pickard, Ph.D. Professor of electrical and systems engineering at Washington University School of Engineering (retired)

Pickard recently co-edited a special volume of the Proceedings of the IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) entitled “The Intermittency Challenge: Massive Energy Storage in a Sustainable Future.”  In this volume the authors discuss various strategies for coping with the fact that the sun only shines during the day, and the “Wind bloweth where it listeth” (John 3:8, King James Bible).

Sun and wind can provide plenty of energy to support a modern industrial world. Gregory Wilson, Director of the National Center for Photovoltaics, calculates that even with the less-than-constant sun of St. Louis, and using today’s solar panels, a field 7% the size of the United States landmass could power the entire planet. Of course many areas on earth have nearly constant daily sunshine.  And many areas are prone to windy conditions.

Unfortunately sun and wind electricity cannot be stored on a large scale at present.  Without storage, and without backup generators burning fossil fuels, it could be cold and dark at night—with no television to entertain and the possibility that a visit to the emergency room might not even allow an X-ray.

Continue reading Intermittency: Achilles’ heel of renewable energy

More than a meal: Wild turkeys are a conservation success story

Male turkey strutting with tail feathers fanned out
A male turkey struts his stuff to attract a mate. Hear him gobble. Note his red, white and blue head. Hikers in turkey season should wear some orange rather than red for obvious reasons.
Photo courtesy of Missouri Department of Conservation

Legend has it that the turkey was founding father Benjamin Franklin’s preference for our national bird.  In a letter to his daughter, he derided the bald eagle as “of bad moral Character”, and praised the turkey as “withal a true original Native of America… He is besides, though a little vain & silly, a Bird of Courage, and would not hesitate to attack a Grenadier of the British Guards who should presume to invade his Farm Yard with a red Coat on.”

He was certainly right about the native part, as turkeys originated in North America.  And during the spring mating season, the males are perhaps a little vain and silly.

But the courageous part, according to resource scientist Jason Isabelle of the Missouri Department of Conservation, was probably wishful thinking on Franklin’s part.  Turkeys are “incredibly cautious.”   They are not fighters—their instinct is flight.  That flight instinct is what makes them so challenging to hunt, because if they sense any threat they will just run or fly away.  Since they can move on the ground at about 12 mph, they make it hard for the hunter to get off a shot.  They can also fly for short distances, mainly to the trees where they roost at night.
Continue reading More than a meal: Wild turkeys are a conservation success story